12 steps to a color revolution

Hong Kong has become the latest example of a dish prepared under a “NEW WORLD ORDER RECIPE” (with only 12 steps).

"Occupy Central," a civil disobedience campaign initiated in January 2013, is believed to be stirred up through the 12 steps that the U.S. HAS BEEN (?!) TAKING to detroy a nation. Yes, a nation.

1) Dispatch CIA, MI6 and other intelligence officers as students, tourists, volunteers, businessmen, reporters to the target country.

2) Set up non-governmental organizations (NGO) under the guise of humanitarianism to fight for "democracy" and "human rights" in order to attract advocates of freedom and ideals.

3) Attract local traitors, especially academics, politicians, reporters, soldiers, etc., through bribery or threaten those who have some stain in their life.

4) If the target country has labor unions, bribe them.

5) Pick a catchy theme or color for the revolution.

6) Start protests for whatever reasons to kick off the revolution. Evidence isn't necessary; an excuse will do.

7) Write protest signs and banners in English to let Americans see and get American politicians and civilians involved.

8) Let those corrupted politicians, intellectuals and union leaders join the protests, and call upon all people with grievances to join.

9) The US and Europe mainstream media help continuously emphasize that the revolution is caused by injustice, thereby gaining the support of the majority.

10) When the whole world is watching, stage a false-flag operation. Fake an atrocity on the protesters. The target government will soon be destabilized and lose support among its people.

11) Add in violent agent provocateurs to provoke the police to use force. This will cause the target government to lose the support of other countries and become “delegitimized” by the international community.

12) Send politicians to the US, EU, UN to petition, so that the target government will face the threat of economic sanctions, no-fly zones, and even air strikes and an armed rebel uprising.

A MUST-WATCH: 

Occupy Central: USA's 12 Steps to Bring China into WW3 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=abK0Kxb2ufg

-------------------------------------

This has been reported in The Standard one month after Occupy Central commenced:

The Standard: 12 steps to a color revolution

Hong Kong, Tuesday, October 28, 2014

A video clip on YouTube that says Occupy Central is the result of a currency war between China and America has gone viral, attracting more than 600,000 hits online.

The video, called "Psychological Wars in the Streets of Hong Kong," said there was a "difference in focus" between the Occupy movement and Beijing in handling the issue of universal suffrage in Hong Kong.

The Occupy movement talked about international standards while the government about country safety.

It also accused the US government of attempting a "full-spectrum dominance" strategy in China, which meant they would try to gain control over all dimensions of battle areas and resources, be they terrestrial, aerial or even psychological.

In another YouTube clip that has garnered more than 800,000 hits in nine days, the narrator concluded the United States used 12 steps to overthrow foreign governments.

The 26-minute video, posted by user "ziondaily," also questioned the US government's willingness to intervene in the democratic development of other countries.

In the video, the voiceover said the CIA would send agents to targeted foreign countries who pretended to be students, tourists, volunteers, businessmen or journalists as a first step. Then they would set up non- governmental organizations to recruit people who had aspirations of freedom.

Next would be bribing scholars, politicians, journalists and soldiers to control them.

Further steps included launching protests and overthrowing governments under such banners as human rights, democracy or government corruption, and then requesting bribed scholars and politicians to call on people to join the protests.

The United States would then try to rationalize the "revolutions" in mainstream media.

Then the foreign media would cover the stories, and at the same time, some "radical spies" would blend in with protesters and take violent action to provoke police to use force to suppress the protests. Then the government would lose legitimacy as well as support from foreign countries.

Finally, politicians would attend hearings in America and the United Nations and explain what has happened, resulting in international society imposing sanctions on the target country such as economic sanctions, no-fly zones, providing weapons to rebels or even assistance in air raid attacks.

The video quoted retired US general Wesley Clark's speech in 2007 when he said: "There is a policy coup in this country. Some hard-nosed people took over the direction of American policy and they never bothered to inform the rest of us."

Clark revealed an officer from the Pentagon Joint Chiefs of Staff told him of a classified memo which said the US government was going to attack and destroy seven countries in five years: Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Iran.

BOSTON BOMBINGS: THEY PREDICTED A 2ND OKLAHOMA CITY BOMBING

(April 16) Terrorism experts say the deadly Boston bombings were most likely home-grown, outlining three possible scenarios for how the attacks were orchestrated.   There are three options: an international terrorist group, a domestic organization, or a lone psychopath. The possibility of the attack being the work of an international terrorist group is just one of the theories currently under investigation.

The timing and placement of the bombs suggest whoever is responsible was looking for maximum media coverage. It could be a domestic terrorist.

• It is close to, but not exactly, the 20th anniversary of Waco – that’s on April 19 [In the incident at Waco in 1993, extremists were besieged and ultimately killed by US officials.]
• It is also Patriots’ Day, which is a day of some historical significance.
• It’s also Tax Day in the US and there have been acts of terrorism related to that before.

In the United States there is a history of home-grown violence. One of the worst incidents occurred in 1995 when succeeded in blowing up a government building in Oklahoma. Experts believe timing of this week’s attack may be significant. This is probably one of the most significant weeks within the context of the American far right. It runs from the anniversary of the American Revolution and some of the people involved in the American far right consider themselves to be a patriot movement. (Source)

Last month, MSNBC warned the American public that “it only takes one person to create another Oklahoma City situation.” So who was the man on a roof above the blast shown in the photo taken during the second explosion in Boston on Monday? Another Timothy McVeigh? A “far right” American who considers himself a patriot? This would confirm that patriot groups are dangerous?

MSM Says Patriot Groups Are Dangerous; Obama Says Debt Crisis Is No Big Deal

The reason the government needs to spy on its own people, to take away their guns, to suppress the right to express one’s opinions and ideas freely is to establish the new order. They predicted a 2nd Oklahoma City bombing and were basically saying, ““It will happen again and when it does, we know exactly who’s behind it.” Was it just an accurate and timely forecast or were the bombings part of the agenda to fight the growing resistance? Have you noticed that as citizens, your rights are gradually slipping away but the government is keeping more so-called secrets in the name of national security?

U.S. government citing security to censor more public records: What can the people do?

Will the government and media inform the masses immediately in time of disaster?!

When disasters occur, will the government and media inform the public immediately?

A blast in CNOOC (China National Offshore Oil Corp) Huizhou refinery, a brand of Daya Bay nuclear power plant in China’s Guangdong province –– occurred at around 4.10 on 11 July 2011. The reason was that 3 pumps at the bottom of the refinery tower broke into fire.

When the fire broke out, Huizhou refinery fire services, Daya Bay fire services, petrolchemical logistics fire services and CNOOC and Shell fire services with more than 40 fire engines participated in the rescue. Oil spill alert was also started.

At around 9 pm, CNOOC's Huizhou refinery Office Ma Hongming told the press that the fire was extinguished. No casualties and no oil spill were reported. Each facility in the factory functioned properly and the equipment was under control.

The smokes resulted in the fire were petrol (mainly carbon dioxide) and there was no hazardous elements. CNOOC's Huizhou refinery denied any explosion broken out.

If we only watch the news, it seems that the incident is not serious and the fire was already under control. As for the local residents, it seems that there is no danger and they do not need to escape.

Has explosion occurred?

According to the witnesses, when the fire broke out, residents witnessed that the blast was up to hundred meters tall and there were heavy smokes.

Some residents even described that if you witnessed the fire scene, you would know what a doomsday look like.

Being the mass media and news broadcasters, why don’t they report the actual situation such as explosion?

Why it is actually the public who pictured the scene and circulated on the Internet?

At 1:55pm in the afternoon, the so-called “under control” fire scene exploded again. Heavy smoke was resulted. Some of the combustion equipment fell down. 10 remote water guns being set in the area were drowned in the fire. The scene was horrible.

Luckily, the front line firemen controlled the high-tech movable water guns in a long distance so that a horrible disaster could be avoided. 

The fire lasted for 13 hours. Luckily, the nuclear power plant 20 miles away was not affected.

After looking at the shocking truth, one can’t help asking why does the authority always not reflect the seriousness of the incident? 

When disaster happens, will the government and media inform the public of the danger of the disaster it the first place?